Use Security Champions

Learn how security champions can scale security practices across your team — a practical lesson for developers.

Focus: use security champions to grow your team

Sponsored

Your team is shipping features at a sprint pace, but security reviews are bottlenecked in one or two people. Vulnerabilities slip through, and you are constantly firefighting. You cannot hire a security engineer for every team, and you cannot expect every developer to become one overnight. The answer is to grow security champions — dedicated, motivated engineers embedded in each team who act as your security force multipliers. This lesson shows you how to find, train, and empower champions so security becomes a shared responsibility, not a bottleneck.

The problem this lesson solves

In most software teams, security is either silent until a breach or centralized in a single security team. Both approaches fail at scale.

The bottleneck problem: A small security team cannot review every PR, every design doc, or every dependency update. Requests pile up, releases get delayed, and security becomes the "no" department.

The knowledge isolation problem: Developers know their codebase but not security patterns. Security engineers know threats but not the code. Information gets lost in translation, and fixes are applied late or incorrectly.

The motivation problem: Security is often seen as "someone else's job." Without ownership, developers skip threat modeling, ignore secure coding guidelines, and treat security tooling as a nuisance.

Pro tip: The goal of a security champion program is not to create mini-security-engineers. It is to create embedded helpers who can answer basic security questions, spot common issues early, and escalate the hard stuff.

Core concept / mental model

Think of your security team as the fire department — they respond to emergencies, do inspections, and train the public. Your security champions are the building wardens in each floor. They know the fire exits, can pull the alarm, and can evacuate people before the fire department arrives. They are not fire experts, but they are trained enough to prevent small fires from becoming disasters.

A security champion is a developer who:

  • Cares about security and is willing to learn more.
  • Communicates security concerns to their team and back to the security team.
  • Contributes to security practices like code reviews, threat modeling, and tooling.
  • Champions (yes, the pun) security in design discussions and release planning.

Key definitions:

  • Security champion: A developer who participates in security activities beyond their normal role, learning and promoting security within their team.
  • Security multiplier: A champion who reduces the workload on the central security team by handling common issues locally.

The snowball effect: When you have one champion per team, they share knowledge, run lunch-and-learns, and mentor others. The result is not just more hands — it is a culture change. Security becomes part of "how we do things here."

How it works step by step

Implementing a security champion program is not a one-time event; it is an ongoing cycle. Here is the step-by-step process that has worked for teams at scale.

Step 1: Get leadership buy-in

Without executive sponsorship, a champion program will die from lack of time and recognition. Make the business case: fewer vulnerabilities, faster time-to-market, better risk posture. Secure a small budget for training time, conferences, or internal tools.

Step 2: Select initial champions

Start small. Pick one or two volunteers from each team who show curiosity and influence. Do not force it — reluctant champions are worse than none. Look for:

  • People who ask "why" about security.
  • Developers who already fix security bugs on their own.
  • Individuals who communicate across roles.

Step 3: Train them

Pair champions with security team mentors. Create a curriculum: secure coding, threat modeling, OWASP Top 10, and hands-on exercises. Provide a dedicated channel (Slack/Discord) and monthly sync meetings.

Step 4: Give them tools and autonomy

Champions need to act, not just talk. Give them:

  • access to security tools (SAST, dependency scanners),
  • the authority to block a merge for a critical vulnerability, and
  • a clear escalation path to the security team.

Step 5: Recognize and reward

Champion work is extra work. Recognize it in performance reviews, awards, or even small swag. If that doesn't happen, the program will fade.

Step 6: Measure and expand

Track metrics: number of champions, vulnerability discovery time, fix turnaround, and team satisfaction. Renew the program quarterly, and scale from pilot teams to the whole engineering org.

Hands-on walkthrough

Let's make this concrete. Suppose you are a team lead and you want to grow champions using a simple Python script that tracks champion activity in a repo.

Example 1: Identify potential champions from commit history

You can use git and a small Python script to find developers who recently touched security-related files.

import subprocess
import collections

# Files often involved in security fixes
SECURITY_PATHS = ['auth/', 'encrypt/', 'security/', 'middleware/']

def get_security_commits(repo_path='.'):
    # Get last 200 commits with changed paths
    log = subprocess.run(
        ['git', '-C', repo_path, 'log', '--name-only', '--format=%an', '-200'],
        capture_output=True, text=True
    ).stdout
    author = None
    counts = collections.Counter()
    for line in log.splitlines():
        if line.strip():
            if line == line.strip():
                author = line.strip()
            else:
                file_path = line.strip()
                if any(file_path.startswith(p) for p in SECURITY_PATHS):
                    counts[author] += 1
        else:
            author = None
    return counts

if __name__ == '__main__':
    for author, count in get_security_commits().most_common(5):
        print(f'{author}: {count} security commits')

Expected output (sample):

Alice: 12 security commits
Bob: 8 security commits
Carol: 3 security commits

Now you know who is already security-minded — prime champion candidates.

Example 2: Map team security knowledge with a simple quiz

Create a short quiz of 10 questions (e.g., on OWASP Top 10). Use this Python snippet to score and rank participation.

# quiz_scores.py
scores = {
    'alice': [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],  # perfect
    'bob':   [1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1],  # one miss
    'carol': [0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0],  # mixed
}

print("Top security knowledge:")
for name, answers in sorted(scores.items(), key=lambda x: sum(x[1]), reverse=True):
    print(f'{name}: {sum(answers)}/10')

Expected output:

Top security knowledge:
alice: 10/10
bob: 9/10
carol: 5/10

Champions don't need perfect scores — they need a baseline (say 7/10) and a willingness to learn more.

Example 3: Automate role notification on Slack

After selecting champions, use a Python script to announce them and share resources.

# notify_champions.py
import os
import requests

WEBHOOK_URL = os.getenv('SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL')
champions = ['Alice', 'Bob']  # from your selection process

message = {
    "text": f"🎉 Welcome our new security champions: {', '.join(champions)}! "
             "They are your first line of defense. #security"
}

response = requests.post(WEBHOOK_URL, json=message)
print(f'Slack status: {response.status_code}')

Expected output:

Slack status: 200

Compare options / when to choose what

There is more than one way to spread security knowledge. Here is a quick comparison:

Approach Description Pros Cons Best for
Security champions Embedded developers with extra training Scalable, cultural, contextual Requires time and management Growing orgs with distinct teams
Centralized security team only All reviews done by security team Consistent, expert Bottleneck, slow, disconnected Small teams or very high-risk envs
External training + compliance Annual security courses Simple to measure Not contextual, forgotten quickly Regulatory minimums
Automated tooling only SAST/DAST in CI Fast, consistent No human judgment, false positives Teams without security expertise yet

Choose champions when: You have multiple teams and limited security staff. You want to build a security culture, not just check a box.

Choose centralized only when: You are a startup with one team — champions are overkill.

Variation — Ambassador model: Some orgs call them "security ambassadors" and focus on communication rather than technical training. That works if your security team wants to stay hands-on but needs more ears in the field.

Troubleshooting & edge cases

Champion turnover: People leave roles. Mitigation: always have at least two champions per team, and rotate recertification every 6–12 months.

Champion burnout: Champions feel overloaded. Mitigation: cap champion workload, provide clear boundaries, and recognize effort.

No volunteers: If nobody raises their hand, run a lunch-and-learn on a real incident you handled — interest often follows.

Champion becomes a bottleneck again: Sometimes the champion ends up doing all security work on the team. That defeats the purpose. Redirect: use the champion to enable others, not to do security for them.

Leadership doesn't buy in: Without time or recognition, champions lose steam. Solution: present the ROI — fewer critical vulns, faster recovery, lower insurance risk. Use metrics from your pilot.

Champion not empowered: If they can't access tools or escalate, they are just a security mascot. Give them write access to a security channel, vulnerability tracker, and a clear escalation note.

Pro tip: Start with a 3-month pilot, collect concrete wins (e.g., "we found and fixed an auth bypass before release"), and then present them to leadership for expansion.

What you learned & what's next

You now understand the core of using security champions to grow your team: what a champion is, how to set up a program, and how to avoid common pitfalls. You also practiced using Python to identify potential champions, assess knowledge, and automate communication.

You learned:

  • You don't need more security engineers — you need embedded, motivated champions.
  • A champion program is a process — select, train, empower, recognize, and repeat.
  • Hands-on tools like Python and Slack can make the program run smoothly.

Next lesson: You'll explore how to measure security culture and maturity, so you can prove that your champion program is actually working. Or, if you're in a CI/CD world, you might look at gating builds on security scan results.

Take the champion idea and run a mini pilot in your team this week. Ask one volunteer to review the OWASP Top 10 and bring findings to the next retro. That's your first champion spark.

Practice recap

Run a mini champion search in your current repo: use the provided script to find the top 3 developers touching security-related paths. Then ask one of them (who also scores well on a short security quiz) if they'd like to lead a monthly security review. That's your first pilot champion step.

Common mistakes

  • Treating champions as a formal title without giving them extra time or support — they will just be normal developers who get annoyed at extra work.
  • Selecting only senior engineers and skipping eager juniors who actually have time to learn and push for change.
  • Not recognizing the extra work in performance reviews — champions stop volunteering when they see no career benefit.
  • Expecting champions to be experts and only letting them ask 'dumb' questions — that destroys psychological safety.
  • Centralizing all security decisions again because the champion found a bug — that's regression, not growth.

Variations

  1. Security ambassadors program — focuses on communication and culture rather than deep technical work.
  2. Guild or community of practice — champions from all teams meet monthly to share threat models and tooling.
  3. Automated detection of security commits (like the script above) to identify natural enthusiasts — works alongside a formal program.

Real-world use cases

  • A fintech startup triples its engineering team and uses champions in each squad to review auth changes before they hit production.
  • An e-commerce platform embeds champions in the checkout and payment teams, reducing repeated vulnerabilities in payment flows.
  • A healthcare software company establishes champions to bridge the gap between security compliance requirements and daily dev workflows.

Key takeaways

  • Security champions scale security by embedding expertise in every team, reducing central bottlenecks.
  • Champions are developers who are motivated and trained, not security engineers — set that expectation clearly.
  • The program involves continuous selection, training, empowerment, recognition, and measurement.
  • Use Git history and knowledge quizzes to identify potential champions in a data-driven way.
  • Avoid champion burnout and turnover by capping workload and providing clear autonomy and escalation paths.
  • Start small, pilot for 3 months, gather metrics, then expand to the whole org.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Discussion

Questions, corrections, and tips help everyone reading this page.

0 comments

Add a comment

Shown publicly with your comment.

Be constructive · max 4,000 characters

No comments yet — start the thread.

Related tutorials, quizzes, and articles for this topic.